It’s The Real Thing – The Bad Coke Joke
Tuesday, 18 April 2006
To the kid in McDonald’s or the nominated driver in the pub, it’s almost predictable that they will order a coke drink. It’s part of modern life, coke as shorthand for soft drink. Worried about your weight? Diet Coke (strangely often ordered with a large lardburger and huge fries). Fancy a change? Try Cherry Coke. In fast food chains and motorway service stations, there is often little or no choice apart from drinks from the Coca-Cola or Pepsi family.
Few Coke drinkers would suspect that there could be a darker side to the company which produces their favourite drink, but tear the ring-pull off the corporate can and it’s not the smell of a sweet fizzy drink that hits your nostrils.
The company and its products appear to pose a threat to health, human rights and to the environment. There is certainly enough evidence to make anyone with a conscience do a little investigation before picking up another Coca-Cola product.
Health warning
Most people will know about the health issues arising from too much sugar in their diet (some critics claim a 330ml can of Coke contains nearly 10 teaspoons of sugar, Coke’s own sources confirm a sugar content of 10.6%) but thanks to the efforts of whole armies of corporate lawyers a lot less is known about the dangers of the artificial sweeteners which appear in most fizzy drinks, especially the diet variety.
Aspartame is one of the controversial ingredients which has enjoyed significant political and financial support to oppose and suppress the investigations of concerned scientists and nutritionists. It’s hard to believe that the corporate concerns are putting people’s health before profit. Another one to look out for is acesulfame potassium (with its ‘cute’ nickname ace-k). More details about aspartame can be found in articles in The Ecologist.
One of Coca-Cola’s natural enemies is water. It’s cheaper, healthier and, once upon a time, was more easily available. The company has launched various campaigns – such as “Just Say No To H2O” - with its corporate customers (chain restaurants), working together to reduce orders for tap water and increase the sales of carbonated drinks. Check out the details in articles on News Target and Lard Biscuit.
Strangely, we see few fat, toothless, sick people in Coke adverts.
Environmental warning
In its efforts to increase production and reduce costs, Coca-Cola has opened bottling and canning plants in poorer countries where wages are significantly lower. Unfortunately many of these countries also suffer from a scarcity of water and local peoples are suffering as a result.
Coke uses precious water supplies even when the original supply levels are inadequate to meet a local community’s drinking water and agricultural needs. According to Coca-Cola HBC’s Social Responsibility Report 2004, 2.95 litres of water are used for each litre of produced beverage.
According to WaterAid, “Clean water is essential for life, but over a billion people in the world do not have it. This and the lack of sanitation result in over two million people dying from water-related diseases every year. The lack of clean water close to people's homes also affects people's time, livelihoods and quality of life.” Its Spring 2006 campaign letter adds, "somewhere in the world a child dies every 15 seconds from water-related diseases." It’s difficult to equate social responsibility with a company exploiting vital resources in poor nations in order to reduce its production costs.
"somewhere in the world a child dies every 15 seconds from water-related diseases" WaterAid and other organisations campaign and work to make clean water available to some of the world’s poorest people, but it would be interesting to know how many of their supporters buy Coca-Cola products in sweet ignorance of the company’s contribution to the problems such charities are trying to solve. You can investigate further at the India Resource Centre.
Human rights warning
Coca-Cola’s treatment of its workers – or those of its subsidiaries, contractors and franchisees – in countries like Colombia is well documented on internet sites such as killercoke and cokewatch. At best the company is linked to union-bashing and strenuous efforts to restrict workers’ rights. At worst, it appears to be linked to intimidation, physical violence, kidnapping, torture and even murder. One example, In 1996 Isidro Gil wrote to Coca-Cola HQ in Atlanta informing them that the plantmanager had threatened workers that he would use paramilitary groups to destroy the union. He got no written response. Armed paramilitaries somehow entered the Coke plant, killed Isidro, and escaped without capture. Lax security or "aiding and abetting"? In addition, the union office was burned down, another worker was killed and the entire union formed to renounce its membership - on forms previously prepared by Coke management(source: Columbia Solidarity Campaign).
The IUF and Coca-Cola have recently agreed that the UN’s International Labour Organisation will conduct an independent investigation into the company’s Colombian operations.
Great Drinks for Thirsty Fascists
According to sources including a transcript from Mark Thomas' speech at a rally in London in June 2004, Coca-Cola entered the German market in 1929 and had gained a foothold in the drinks sector by 1933. In 1936, it was an official beverage sponsor of the Berlin Olympics. It’s alleged that one of Coca-Cola’s products was launched in Nazi Germany, the reason why Mark Thomas calls Fanta “the drink of the Nazis”. The company had bottles manufactured in the annexed territory of Sudetenland and imported into Nazi Germany. In fact, one of the few threats to Coca-Cola’s success in Germany was its link to America and rumours of its owners Jewish origins. The sale of its products in Germany in the thirties and forties seems out of step with its 1943 US patriotic slogan, “Universal Symbol of the American Way of Life”.
Hogwash and Greenwash
Like many corporations, Coca-Cola churns out numerous reports boasting of its policies on ethics, social responsibility, environmental concern etc. but the suspicion remains that these are produced for two main reasons. Firstly, because they are obliged to do so by legislation and regulatory authorities, and secondly, to convince concerned customers to carry on consuming.
It Runs In The Family
If you decide to withhold your custom from Coca-Cola, you should be aware that Coke is just the tip of a nasty iceberg. Other Coca-Cola products include Dr Pepper, Fanta, Five Alive, Kia-Ora, Lilt, Malvern Still & Sparkling Water, Minute Maid, Oasis, Powerade, Roses Lime Juice Cordial and Sprite. It’s a bit like the end of a Scooby Doo movie, when the villain’s mask is peeled off to reveal……another villain. Hey, this isn’t Sprite, it’s Coca-Cola in drag!
In June 2006 Coca-Cola North America plans to launch Coca-Cola Zero, a drink with the Coca-Cola taste but no calories (but plenty of aspartame and acesulfame potassium). To be honest I’m hoping for a more anagram-based outcome for the UK – zero Coca-Cola.
Action – It’s The Real Thing!
Admittedly, Coca-Cola isn’t the only corporation which markets unhealthy products, undermines workers’ rights, damages the environment and contributes to the spread of poverty and disease, but we’ve got to start somewhere. If you need any further evidence, take a look at War on Want's excellent 2006 report on Coca-Cola. Boycotting their products will work. It has in the US where at least 12 universities and many individual consumers have chosen to do so. It will also send a clear message to Coca-Cola’s management and shareholders. Clean up your act or lose our business.
One of Coke’s old advertising campaigns included the cheesy song, “I’d Like To Teach The World To Sing (In Perfect Harmony)”. I’m struggling to imagine a rich Coca-Cola executive, a Colombian union man’s widow and a thirsty Indian child, arm in arm singing this song lustily in unison. But it’s a funny old world……
LINKED ARTICLES
Top Mark Fails Coke (Mark Thomas' adventures in Cokeworld)
Search
Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.
Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

I agree wholeheartedly that the ethical, social and moral behavious of large multinationals is reprehensible, but I really don't think that a boycott is the answer. As part of a corporate crime course which I teach, we look at the power of the consumer to punish companies for their wrongdoing. I hate to pour cold water (or coke) onto the idea, but with a combination of the current business climate and consumer apathy, boycotts don't work.
With my teaching hat on, let us look at the first and last 2 companies alphabetically on the Ethical Consumer list (3Mobile, Adidas, Teaco and Unilever):
3 UK is wholly-owned by Hutchison Whampoa, based in Hong Kong. The parent company profits after taxation rose from HK$6.1bn (£430m) in 2004 to HK$13.5bn (£950m) in 2005. This is a rise of 120%
Adidas Group had an operating profit in 2004 of 584m Euro (£404m), which rose to 707m Euro (£489m) in 2005. Again, a rise of way more than inflation, at about 20%
Tesco Group's profit after taxes in 2004 was £1.1bn, which rose to £1.4bn in 2005. Not a huge rise, of "only" 27%, but still follows the trend of boycotted companies.
Unilever NV had net profits of 2.8bn Euros (£1.9bn) in 2004, which rose to 3.8 bn Euros (£2.7bn) in 2005, a rise of 42%
Taken as a whole, these four companies saw a rise in post-tax profits from £3.8bn to £5.5bn in one year (45%). These figues are tiny compared to the combined profit of Exxon, Shell, Texaco and BP of course, who between them made £97bn profit on a turnover of £1,229bn (which is more than every country on Earth other than the US and Japan)
To put these numbers further into perspective, in 2004-5 the expenditure limit on the Department for International Development was £3.3bn, which echoes the point that the power of multinational corporations to influence global politics is starting to exceed that of governments.
Anyway, back to the real nub: boycotts. They [I]can[/I] work, but only if huge numbers of people become involved. Is there an alternative? Sorry to put a downer on a bank holiday weekend, but I don't think so. Feel free to disagree, of course!
Having re-reading what I wrote at the end of last week, I realised it could look as though I am pro-corporate power, which I'm not.
Apathy is indeed the biggest enemy - as the author and journalist Cycil Connolly wrote: "slums may well be the breeding grounds of crime, but middle class suburbs are incubators of apathy"
How do we fight apathy? Answers of a postbard...
Coke has worse effects on your health than you may think. For example: besides the obvious such as weight gain and toothdecay, coke can be a major factor causing type 2 diabetes
The carbonated water used in coke has been found to decay our bone matter, as it dissolves the culcium of our bones, therefore leading to weakened bones more susceptible to fractures (breaks) and osteoporosis
The sweetener used in diet coke (Aspartame) can cause: Brain tumors, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, chronic fatigue syndrome, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, mental retardation, lymphoma, birth defects, fibromyalgia, and diabetes....just to name a few
somehow...I'm not too keen on a glass of coke, on this lovely sunny day
I've finally found a good use for diet coke that may change your current opinions.
http://www.eepybird.com/dcm1.html
I'm sure you will agree
Mr.Mooha
A.K.A. Sam